Feed Icon RSS Syndication

Latest Entries

Archives

Geographic Blog Roll
Intelligent Travel
Adventure Blog
NG News—Chief Editor Blog
NG News—Breaking Orbit Blog
Great Apes Blog
Allroads Project Blog
The Green Guide Blog
Genographic Project Blog
NG Channel Explorer Blog
NG Kids—Hands on Explorer
NG Kids—GlobalBros
Contours—Nat Geo Maps
My Wonderful World Blog

Read the latest from our editors and photographers, get photo tips, or comment on the latest issue.

September 2007

Posted Sep 30,2007

Oldvelprototrood0139lr Greg Paul's prescient illustration of a Velociraptor with quilled arm feathers (on the left)  was prepared almost twenty years ago. © Gregory S. Paul

Isn’t it interesting that a high-power trio of scientists, Alan Turner of Columbia University , Pete Makovicky  of the Field Museum (an NGS grantee) and  Mark Norell of the American Musuem of Natural History have now identified quill knobs on a Velociraptor ulna (see Science )?

It was not so long ago that such a claim would have generated an outcry from a vocal minority of scientists who opposed the hypothesis of a bird-dinosaur link like Storrs Olson of the Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History and Alan Feduccia of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, but I haven’t heard a peep, have you? I remember that Feduccia threatened to cancel his subscription to National Geographic he was so incensed with an article we published in 1998 on the dinosaurian origin of birds. I don’t know if he ever followed through on that, but when National Geographic published an article including “Archaeoraptor,” a fossil dino-bird that turned out to be a faked composite of two skeletons, he and his other colleagues of like mind screamed bloody murder (partly because they were suspicious of all “dinobirds,” but also because the creature had not yet been properly described in a scientific journal).

I have the dubious distinction of having written that article article back in November 1999 and remember distinctly the sharp tone of Storrs Olsen’s open letter which he sent to numerous scientists and which was reported heavily in creationist web sites as evidence against evolution. It was addressed to Dr. Peter Raven, chairman of the National Geographic Society’s Committee for Research and Exploration. I present here a couple choice bits from that letter:

“With the publication of "Feathers for T. rex?" by Christopher P. Sloan in its November issue, National Geographic has reached an all-time low for engaging in sensationalistic, unsubstantiated, tabloid journalism.”

and

“The idea of feathered dinosaurs and the theropod origin of birds is being actively promulgated by a cadre of zealous scientists acting in concert with certain editors at Nature and National Geographic who themselves have become outspoken and highly biased proselytizers of the faith. Truth and careful scientific weighing of evidence have been among the first casualties in their program, which is now fast becoming one of the grander scientific hoaxes of our age—the paleontological equivalent of cold fusion. If Sloan's article is not the crescendo of this fantasia, it is difficult to imagine to what heights it can next be taken.”

I don’t know what happened to vocal opposition of this sort. Olson, Feduccia and their colleagues were dutifully quoted by journalists in almost every news article on feathered dinosaurs back then. But as evidence to support the hypothesis has been pouring in, those opposing views quoted so often before in news media have trickled to nothing. So discoveries like the quill knobs on a Velociraptor are reported without mention of controversy.

Yet, this particular discovery should be controversial and generate discussion. Not because a dinosaur had feathers, but because it raises the nagging question of why a non-flying dinosaur had quilled feathers? Quilled feathers, as opposed to downlike “protofeathers” are necessary for flight in birds. There are the standard explanations for why they might appear in flightless dinosaurs: display, thermoregulation, and lift when running up inclines, for example, but another explanation is that quilled feathers are on Velociraptor because it was secondarily flightless, like penguins are today.

I’m sure that many paleontologists will remember that Greg Paul, who published Dinosaurs of the Air: The Evolution and Loss of Flight in Dinosaurs and Birds in 2002, has long argued that just because birds descended from dinosaurs doesn’t mean that the relationship can’t be reversed to produce flightless dinosaurs that descended from birds.

This new debate won’t be resolved anytime soon, but it will be interesting to hear the differing viewpoints. In the meantime, I’m interested in finding the earliest published illustration of Velociraptor that shows it with quilled arm feathers. What’s printed above is the earliest one I could find. It is by paleontologist Greg Paul and appeared in his book Predatory Dinosaurs of the World published in 1988. It is reprinted here with Greg's kind permission. Send anything you think might be earlier to stonesbonesnthings@gmail.com.

Posted by National Geographic Staff | Comments (11)
Filed Under: Paleontology
Posted Sep 21,2007

Chris_female_3lr_2 In the current issue of Nature you’ll find a much-awaited report on the bodies (as opposed to the heads) of the folks that lived at Dmanisi in Georgia (the former Soviet Republic) about two million years ago. The report was much-awaited because only the heads of four of the individuals discovered there have been thoroughly reported. That left many of us wondering what their bodies were like.

We knew their brains were small and early estimates of their height and weight showed they were small in body as well, but we didn’t have a good sense of their body proportions or skeletal details from the neck down. And the reason why we cared about their bodies so much was that a paradigm was about to be broken.

Posted by National Geographic Staff | Comments (2)
Filed Under: Anthropology, Biology, Expedition, Paleontology, Research, Science
Posted Sep 21,2007

M8_blk_260_2

Have you been sitting on the fence, checking the limit on your credit card, coveting one of the loveliest cameras you will ever hold, wondering whether or not to invest in a Leica M8 digital body? Well don’t linger any longer because Leica has an offer you can’t refuse—a price increase of $550.00.

According to a Leica representative they have been fending off the increase since early this year, due mainly to the weakening dollar. It seems the M8 rollout honeymoon is over.

If you are already a proud M8 owner, don’t forget to keep up with the firmware updates. The latest version is 1.107, posted July 27th, is well worth the time to install.

Ken Geiger

Posted by National Geographic Staff | Comments (0)
Posted Sep 19,2007

Softwarechallenge_2

Here's a digital photography challenge: what would you do if needed to rename thousands of images? 

  • I received 13,000 images from a photographer.  The files are named incorrectly and many hundreds of images have the same name.
  • All files need to be sorted by the time they were created and renamed from 1 through 13,000.
  • The files are located within more than 140 sub-folders by file category and in no apparent date order.
  • Each of the images has an XMP file containing the caption information and this file needs to be renamed exactly as the file is named.

What program(s) would you use to quickly rename the photographs?

Posted by National Geographic Staff | Comments (27)
Filed Under: Photography Tips
Posted Sep 16,2007

1_img_0160_175

One of the best attributes of digital photography is the instant gratification of seeing your photograph appear on the preview screen, this handy feature makes today’s cameras great for experimentation. One technique I use to put a little spice into situations with poor light quality or jazz up party snapshots is to add a little controlled motion to my images.

Posted by National Geographic Staff | Comments (3)
Filed Under: Digital cameras, Digital Photography, Photography Tips
Posted Sep 14,2007

Edtors_note_blog My family's journey to the land of biofuels began when my wife, Elizabeth, and two of her friends, Rosa and Ellen, bought subcompact diesel automobiles. They researched hybrids, but because we live in a rural area, with no stoplights, sparse traffic, and vast distances, diesel appeared to be a better choice. Given their desire to consume less energy, the 45-mile-a-gallon (72 kilometers) vehicles seemed perfect. They were further swayed by the recent introduction of ultra-low sulfur diesel that significantly cuts emissions, as well as the cars' ability to run on biodiesel. As its name implies, biodiesel is fuel processed from biological sources instead of petroleum. It is renewable, nontoxic, and typically reduces greenhouse gas emissions by more than 60 percent over conventional diesel.

Now alternative fuels are a topic of conversation in my family. My children are intrigued with the thought of riding in a car powered by used cooking oil from the local fast-food restaurant. We've pointed out that biodiesel comes from sources like soybeans, but the concept of a soybean-powered car bored them. We recaptured their interest, however, when we mentioned the promise of algae as a biofuel. My ten-year-old son, Tim, thought the cool quotient of algae surpassed that of cooking oil. But my teenage daughters, Noel and Louise, preferred the idea of filling the tank with cooking oil in the hope that the exhaust would smell like french fries.

Is biodiesel the answer to the energy and environmental challenges we face? Not by itself. But it is a step in the right direction when combined with other innovative solutions. Besides, filling up your car with biodiesel may provoke some interesting family conversations.

Johns_sig

Posted by National Geographic Staff | Comments (20)
Filed Under: National Geographic, Photography
Posted Sep 11,2007

Bog_combined_2

What a difference a few years can make. Ten years ago, Brooklyn-based photographer Robert Clark started a story for the Geographic on the beautifully and eerily preserved 2,000-year-old bodies unearthed from European peat bogs.

Posted by National Geographic Staff | Comments (15)
Filed Under: Director's Pick
- Advertisement -
National Geographic Twitter
Please note all comments are reviewed by the blog moderator before posting.