Rudapithecus hungaricus, above, may be the ancestor of African great apes, including humans, but it lived in Europe. Artwork © John Gurche.
While the spotlight of the day might rest on the newly announced Miocene ape, Anoiapithecus brevirostris, another important early great ape is sitting in the shadows. It is Rudapithecus hungaricus, which, along with Dryopithecus and Anoiapithecus, is considered by some to be related to living great apes. Rudapithecus may be the closest we have yet come to finding the ancestor of African great apes and humans. All of these fossil apes were found in Europe.
Rudapithecus, nicknamed Gabi, was discovered through the work of National Geographic grantee David Begun of the University of Toronto and his collaborator at the Geological Institute in Budapest, László Kordos. The fossil is known from an almost complete skull and mandible (the only such set from a Miocene ape in Europe) and some skeletal parts, including a pelvis, two thigh bones, and wrist bones.
Begun has long championed the idea that the ancestors of African apes evolved in Eurasia. In his view, Anoiapithecus adds more evidence to support his hypothesis. Begun suggests, however, that Anoiapithecus is very similar to Dryopithecus, and may not deserve the status of a new genus. Furthermore, while Anoiapithecus, which is 12 million years old, is presented as ancestral to all great apes, Rudapithecus, which is 10 million years old, is ancestral only to a subfamily of great apes that excludes orangutans but includes humans. Thus Rudapithecus is key to the argument that the earliest members of the African great ape lineage we evolved from appeared first in Europe before returning to Africa.
Scientists who disagree with Begun discount the significance of the Miocene apes of Europe, including Rudapithecus, because they think African great apes evolved in Africa. Unfortunately, there is a gap in the fossil record in Africa between Miocene apes living there before 14 million years ago and the appearance of hominins in Africa between 7 and 5 million years ago. So there is little fossil evidence to support the view that great apes evolved from earlier African apes in Africa. To remedy this paleontologists are scouring Africa for fossil apes that lived there between 12 and 5 million years ago, when the lineages of gorillas, chimps, and humans diverged. And in Hungary, Begun and Kordos will keep searching for more remains of Rudapithecus, hoping they will provide further evidence for their "Out of Europe" hypothesis. They are confident that more of Gabi's skeleton remains buried at the site, which is near Rudabánya. National Geographic is funding their continued excavations there.
The fossil skull of the Rudapithecus specimen nicknamed Gabi (below) is remarkably well preserved and shares features with gorillas, such as short lower parts of the face. Photo © David Begun.



Comments
Jun 11, 2009 10PM #
It would make sense to me that for major evolution to occur, an entirely new enviroment, isolated from previous areas of inhabitation, would be required, especially where conditions would inspire change like eurasia.
Jun 11, 2009 10PM #
I'm perplexed by several unexplored aspects of Neanderthals. Wouldn't it make sense that these small isolated groups would have little exposure to pathogens, similar to other isolated groups of humans, who were decimated? I think it is likely interbreeding happened, however, disease likely left the Neanderthals and offspring not viable.
Neanderthals, squat and powerful, would likely hunt by ambush, which means they would need cover. The rocky outcrops where caves are found make logistical sense. Since the last outposts found are in southern Iberia, why is it not assumed that the Neanderthals continued south, living much longer in caves that are now submerged by the rising seas 12,000 years ago? Several myths speak of giants living in the earth along the coasts. Why not explore these for clues too?
Jun 11, 2009 10PM #
Can't help noticing that wherever the specimens may be from they continue to look like my African Descent relatives...To me this new quandry looks like an not unfamiliar European inability to accept reality that Europe is not the center of the known and unknown world.
Jun 11, 2009 10PM #
If it's found in Europe, it is by definition "European." Do you mean "white people," Anna?
Jun 11, 2009 10PM #
That's ape. Brain's too small.
Jun 11, 2009 10PM #
I might be outdated as geo- is not my speciality but I would like to say to my sister Anna... I do not recall any dispute on the theory that life began in Africa... That species gradually moved to other parts and developed new features that were primarily influenced by the environment they lived in... So this man did not leave Africa as a European but an African and gradually his off-spring because of conditions in Europe, evolved into the present day European... I am making any sense folks?
Jun 11, 2009 10PM #
Cute ears!
Do they really, Anna? Africans all look different to me.
Jun 11, 2009 10PM #
We're African, we just get around ya know. I'm so proud of my African and Afro-European cousins: Ardi and Gabi. What brave little souls they must have been. Rest in peace girls.
A
Jun 11, 2009 10PM #
You, know add a little more flesh on top and some fur he could pass for a near gorilla. So, you have apes that left Africa, traveled to Europe and then later came back to Africa only to later return to Europe? So we're Out of Africa, Out of Europe, Out of Africa. Now where did the apes evolve from? Are we eventually going to say which ocean we're out of?
Post a Comment